A surface scanners can't see
Deep links, local storage, IPC and embedded secrets sit far below what automated scanners reach. Manual testing follows the real data and logic flows they skip.
Automated and expert-led manual testing across your app's full attack surface (code, runtime, storage and APIs), mapped to the OWASP MASVS standard, so vulnerabilities are caught on every release, not once a year.
Tested against recognized mobile-security standards
We assess the full mobile attack surface across platforms and architectures, mapped to the OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) and Testing Guide (MASTG).
Deep links, local storage, IPC and embedded secrets sit far below what automated scanners reach. Manual testing follows the real data and logic flows they skip.
The moment your app ships, anyone can pull the binary. Attackers reverse-engineer, repackage and weaponize a build in hours, not weeks.
Frida, Objection and custom RASP bypasses evolve constantly. We test with the same runtime tooling real attackers use, not signature-based scanners.
Passing a MASVS, PCI-DSS or HIPAA checklist proves coverage, not resistance. We validate whether each control actually holds under a real attack.
We combine automated scanning with expert manual testing to uncover vulnerabilities that tools alone can't find.
Source code and binary review without executing the app
Runtime testing while the app is executing
Expert-driven testing simulating real attackers
We combine all three approaches for comprehensive coverage
FAQ
Everything you need to know about our mobile app security testing
We test native iOS (Swift, Objective-C), native Android (Kotlin, Java) and cross-platform apps (React Native, Flutter, Unity), covering the mobile client, local storage, and the backend APIs it talks to.
Security testing is broad and continuous: automated and expert manual checks across your whole app, mapped to OWASP MASVS, ideally on every release. A penetration test is a deeper, point-in-time engagement where experts adversarially exploit a focused set of high-risk targets. Many teams run continuous security testing and add a periodic pen test for compliance or high-risk releases.
Ideally on every release, and continuously through your CI/CD pipeline so regressions are caught as code changes. We can run it as a one-off baseline or as an ongoing program tied to each build.
A clear report of findings mapped to OWASP MASVS, each with a severity rating, evidence, and prioritized remediation guidance, plus a walkthrough call. With an ongoing program you also get trend tracking across releases.
Yes. We verify that fixes are effective and that remediation didn't introduce new issues. In a continuous program, every release is re-tested as part of the pipeline.
Get a comprehensive security assessment from our expert team.